Case Study: Southern Cross Station — 13 Visits in 14 Days

Summary

Spencer Street Signals Section 1101 visits Southern Cross Station 13 times in a 14-day period (4-18 July 2026) to perform 42 work orders. Across the full year, this team visits Southern Cross on 87 separate days to complete 316 work orders. This example demonstrates the scheduling pattern at a major CBD station where the volume of assets generates a near-daily visit from the same team.

The Schedule (4-18 July 2026)

Date WOs Job Types Asset Type Notes
Sat 4 Jul 6 SP327, SP329, SP001 Point Mechanism Point inspections at 2 sets
Sun 5 Jul 2 SP201 Interlocking Relay shelf inspections
Mon 6 Jul 1 SP322B Point Mechanism Single point mech check
Wed 8 Jul 3 SP201 Interlocking Relay shelf inspections
Thu 9 Jul 5 SP201, SP368 Interlocking, Train Detection Relay inspections + train detection
Fri 10 Jul 5 SP322B, SP201 Point Mechanism, Interlocking Point checks + relay inspections
Sat 11 Jul 1 SP201 Interlocking Single relay inspection — entire day
Sun 12 Jul 3 SP368, SP201 Train Detection, Interlocking Train detection + relay inspection
Mon 13 Jul 2 SP327A Point Mechanism Point inspections
Tue 15 Jul 1 SP201 Interlocking Single relay inspection — entire day
Wed 16 Jul 3 SP201 Interlocking Relay shelf inspections
Thu 17 Jul 2 SP201 Interlocking Relay shelf inspections
Fri 18 Jul 8 SP327A, SP322A Point Mechanism Point inspections at multiple sets
Map shows Southern Cross work orders (4-18 July) colour-coded by day. Marker size indicates WO count. Click markers for details.

Why 13 Visits?

Southern Cross is one of the largest and most complex stations on the network, with a high density of interlocking relays, point mechanisms, and train detection equipment. The work orders are dominated by two job types:

The scheduling issue is that the SP201 relay inspections — which have a 5-month window — are placed one per day at their midpoints, creating a daily drip-feed of work. On 3 of the 13 days, the team comes to Southern Cross for just a single SP201 relay inspection.

The Tolerance Windows

Job Frequency Tolerance Window Size WOs in period
SP201 732 days 73 days ~5 months 19
SP327 / SP329 61 / 183 days 6 / 18 days 12-36 days 6
SP327A 21 days 3 days 6 days 7
SP322A / SP322B 21-30 days 3-6 days 6-12 days 7
SP368 366 days 36 days 72 days 3

The point mechanism jobs (SP327A, SP322A, SP322B) have tight 6-12 day windows and genuinely constrain the schedule. But the SP201 relay inspections could be moved anywhere within a 5-month window, and the SP368 train detection jobs have a 72-day window.

What an Optimised Schedule Would Look Like

An optimised approach would anchor visits around the tight-window point mechanism jobs and batch the flexible SP201 and SP368 work onto those same days:

Date WOs What changes
Sat 4 Jul 6 + 2 = 8 Add Jul 5 relay inspections
Mon 6 Jul 1 + 3 + 1 = 5 Add Jul 8 relay inspections + Jul 11 relay
Thu 9 Jul 5 + 3 = 8 Add Jul 10 point checks (windows overlap)
Sun 12 Jul 3 + 1 = 4 Add Jul 15 relay inspection
Mon 13 Jul 2 + 3 + 2 = 7 Add Jul 16-17 relay inspections
Fri 18 Jul 8 Already a full day

This reduces 13 visits to 6 — a 54% reduction — while keeping all work within its tolerance window. The heaviest day would be 8 WOs, well within normal team capacity.

The Scale of the Problem

Across the full year, Spencer Street 1101 visits Southern Cross on 87 separate days to do 316 work orders — an average of just 3.6 WOs per visit. With optimised batching, this could be reduced to approximately 30 visits averaging 10-11 WOs each, eliminating over 50 unnecessary mobilisations to the same station.

Relevance

This case study is significant because:

  1. It's at a CBD station — Southern Cross is one of Melbourne's busiest stations. Every maintenance visit requires coordination with station operations, and reducing visit frequency directly reduces disruption.

  2. The flexible jobs are being treated like rigid ones — SP201 relay inspections have a 5-month window but are scheduled as if they must happen on one specific day. The system makes no attempt to batch them with other work at the same station.

  3. The tight-window jobs provide natural anchor points — the 21-30 day cycle point mechanism checks create a regular cadence that the flexible work could be attached to, rather than scheduled independently.

  4. The pattern is consistent — this isn't a one-off scheduling anomaly. The same near-daily visit pattern occurs throughout the year at Southern Cross, and similar patterns exist at other major stations (Flinders Street, Richmond, North Melbourne).